Quote from Xtreger on September 14, 2012, 10:42 am

My apologies... there were a bunch of tests so I was busy.

@grayarea
Brilliant solution again! Seems like you're taking revenge for Encode

It is completely unintended except for the ending. Anyway now it is clear that [spoiler]there should be one cube on square and one on dot3[/spoiler].

Before releasing the next update, I want to ask whether making the portalable surface in the corner, which you used, unportalable would block your solution till the ending part. I'm having doubts if such a small update would be effective...
If it does, I'll simply change that surface and put up the next version.

Quote from grayarea on September 14, 2012, 11:04 am

Thanks all. I kind of feel like the revenge is going the other way Xtreger!
If you mean the part where I have the cube oscillating through floor portals, then no this would be hard to block. Any portable floor that can see the 21 catcher is suitable in fact I just checked that I can use only the floor in the laser room. I'll send you the demo.

Quote from grayarea on September 14, 2012, 11:13 am

Also I'm a bit confused (again!). You said my solution is completely unintended except for the ending but you only want to block my ending?

Quote from Xtreger on September 14, 2012, 6:09 pm

@grayarea: Oh now I see. I meant in my previous post that the absolute ending trick was intended.
[spoiler]But the alt demo you sent me is exactly what I intended[/spoiler].

Also [spoiler]the alt2 demo is a very good alternative and there is no need to block that[/spoiler].

[spoiler]See your inbox; I sent you a response to one of your previous demos, since you asked whether it was intended.[/spoiler]

I have a feeling this will be solved soon enough now...

Quote from grayarea on September 14, 2012, 11:20 pm

Ok so if I now understand you:
My last trick in the video was intended.
My second last trick was not, but has now been improved to the intended and a valid alternative.
All the previous tricks are unintended, however. That's at least 80% of the puzzle. Are you planning to block any of those? Otherwise it's very hard to imagine what needs to change...

Quote from grayarea on September 15, 2012, 12:45 pm

While I was fumbling around in the dark trying to think how to make my solution better, I found a way to make it a whole lot crazier instead. Here's an alternative beginning:
U9cR82QcRiM

Quote from Xtreger on September 16, 2012, 7:54 am

Updated to version 1.4

Let's see now...

Quote from Sphyrch on September 17, 2012, 5:34 pm

looks nice, but i got very frustrated. this is too hard! not able to solve despite spending more than 2 hours

fingers crossed next version will reveal clues . for now i must take a break from this or my head will explode .

Quote from Xtreger on September 18, 2012, 3:22 pm

Anybody else who's played it and had any progress? Or any feedback?