Quote from iWork925 on March 20, 2014, 1:53 am

Idolon wrote:

CamBen wrote:

Probably because you have 10 posts on here.

That was totally uncalled for. Post count is no reason to demean someone. If you're going to make fun of someone, try and find a decent reason - for example, using the font Papyrus.

If its less then 100, maybe...

Quote from presto668 on March 20, 2014, 7:10 pm

CamBen wrote:

presto668 wrote:

Caden wrote:

He's actually using brushes for those frames, but you're right about them being thin and unattractive.

Funny, I think the pti frames look right and the non-pti frames look fat and unattractive.

Probably because you have 10 posts on here.

So because I don't post every day that means I'm not allowed to have an opinion about glass frames?

I think the wide frames look fine for old Aperture or more industrial maps. For modern levels I prefer the thin frames. It's like a big old 1980s beige-box PC vs. a MacBook Air. Your mileage may vary of course.

Quote from CamBen on March 20, 2014, 10:23 pm

presto668 wrote:

So because I don't post every day that means I'm not allowed to have an opinion about glass frames?

I think the wide frames look fine for old Aperture or more industrial maps. For modern levels I prefer the thin frames. It's like a big old 1980s beige-box PC vs. a MacBook Air. Your mileage may vary of course.

my offensive joke apparently didnt come across as a joke

Quote from iWork925 on March 20, 2014, 10:41 pm

presto668 wrote:

It's like a big old 1980s beige-box PC vs. a MacBook Air. Your mileage may vary of course.

Quote from Caden on March 21, 2014, 11:01 am

I wonder if this guy is just confusing test chamber frames for observation windows.

I mean seriously how could something 8 units thick be considered fat and unattractive?

Quote from Ultiman9711 on March 21, 2014, 1:31 pm

Caden wrote:

I mean seriously how could something 8 units thick be considered fat and unattractive?

When it's adopted.

Quote from FelixGriffin on March 21, 2014, 5:14 pm

Ultiman9711 wrote:

Caden wrote:

I mean seriously how could something 8 units thick be considered fat and unattractive?

When it's adopted.

And? What exactly is wrong with being adopted?

(For the record, you are adopted, and that's horrible.)

Quote from iWork925 on March 21, 2014, 9:33 pm

FelixGriffin wrote:

Ultiman9711 wrote:

Caden wrote:

I mean seriously how could something 8 units thick be considered fat and unattractive?

When it's adopted.

And? What exactly is wrong with being adopted?

(For the record, you are adopted, and that's horrible.)

This thread is going downhill FAST.

Quote from tile on March 22, 2014, 12:31 am

iWork925 wrote:

Quote:

I mean seriously how could something 8 units thick be considered fat and unattractive?

When it's adopted. /quote
And? What exactly is wrong with being adopted?

(For the record, you are adopted, and that's horrible.)/quote
This thread is going downhill FAST.

what do you care?

iWork925 wrote:

Dr.Toaster Waffles wrote:

iWork, why are you so good at burning people?

I am a sociopath.

iWork925 wrote:

Keennan wrote:

...tried to get a real friends

iWork925 wrote:

FelixGriffin wrote:

I used to know someone who would shout variants on this every time someone was insulted.

Insignificant accolade thread #2.

and so on. frankly, im suprised you arent laughing your rear off at others expenses right now. well, since you are no longer being the same as always, i'm revoking one of the 2 fish biscuits i previously gave to you for being the same as always.