distance and objectivity
So I created a map. It's not the first map, nor will it be the last. All those maps were just short and easy, done only to amuse a friend of mine for a few minutes (and he was entertained a few minutes, what makes me glad somehow). But there is this one map, this one map that made me think it is really neat, this one map that made him "wooa, cool!". He convinced me to publish it, and I thougt "mkay, why not" and so I did. As the map engulfed unnoticed in the meaningless mass of daily crap I become aware of some things I didn't expect: I would like to have feedback. Is this map neat? Is this map wooacool? Or is it just another crappy map? How should I know? I don't have the distance and objectivity to judge it in a neutral way. Yeah, that was a lot of blahblah, so here is the
tl;dr:
How do you guys rate your own maps in a neutral manner?
- or -
How do you guys let your own maps be rated in a neutral manner?
Hm, i would say, if you have more experience, youll have more "Wooa, cool" effect.
I personally dont see often on ratings, i just read the feedback, because thats more important (for me).
When you are really great at mapping, you would also make great maps, 
